|
|
Post by maacfan on Dec 11, 2014 22:03:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by maacfan on Dec 11, 2014 22:15:35 GMT -5
48.9% 3pt %
81.2ft %
Ryan Harris | #10 | G | County College of Morris
gp pts/g fg % 3pt % ft % reb/g a/g
22 25.9 49.5 48.9 81.2 4.7 4.5
Player Profile
Game Log
Split Stats
Recent Games
Feb 4 at Lackawanna College L, 82-75
Feb 6 Salem Community College L, 81-76
Feb 8 at Harcum College L, 118-57
Feb 11 Mercer County Community College W, 77-66
Feb 18 at Middlesex County College L, 66-55
Feb 19 at Delaware Technical & CC/Stanton-Wilmington L, 97-72
Statistics category Overall Conf
Games 22 962nd 15 342nd
Games started 21 366th 14 152nd
Minutes 22 1459th 15 1049th
Minutes per game 1.0 1140th 1.0 990th
FG 192-388 58th 131-257 15th
FG Pct 49.5 151st 51.0 134th
3PT 68-139 32nd 47-95 10th
3PT Pct 48.9 10th 49.5 24th
FT 117-144 66th 80-98 22nd
FT Pct 81.2 39th 81.6 50th
Off rebounds 13 994th 9 689th
Def rebounds 91 260th 59 135th
Total rebounds 104 447th 68 263rd
Rebounds per game 4.7 289th 4.5 315th
Personal fouls 52 1207th 32 1111th
Disqualifications 0 633rd 0 706th
Assists 98 113th 69 43rd
Turnovers 82 55th 61 7th
Assist to turnover ratio 1.2 390th 1.1 385th
Steals 60 42nd 39 15th
Blocks 4 674th 4 379th
Points 569 44th 389 13th
Points per game 25.9 3rd 25.9 5th
Points per 40 min 1034.5 - 1037.3 -
stat
|
|
|
|
Post by loyal on Dec 11, 2014 23:56:56 GMT -5
I hope Ryan Harris is the next John Stockton.
I would say the stats are of little value, as the level of competition he faces is quite poor.
Let's hope our staff has unearthed a gem flying way, way under the radar in Morris County.
|
|
|
|
Post by JohnGalt on Dec 12, 2014 0:26:53 GMT -5
Short term back up insurance. K'd on Barrino.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peacock on Dec 12, 2014 1:07:01 GMT -5
I hope Ryan Harris is the next John Stockton. I would say the stats are of little value, as the level of competition he faces is quite poor. Let's hope our staff has unearthed a gem flying way, way under the radar in Morris County. Competition the same as what Hester faced. Issue is that team he is on is very poor. Seems to be the only one of talent, a talent that had not attracted much attention from D1. If you want to have a positive, being the best player he was most likely double teamed and still scored. But then again defense is not forte among most JC teams. |
|
|
|
Post by loyal on Dec 12, 2014 7:52:20 GMT -5
I'm a Hudson Catholic Alum and have seen Barrino play 3 or 4 times.
I was surprised we offered; I don't think Barrino's game translates very well to D 1......not as good as Kavon Stewart, for example, IMO. I think Wyche (who has yet to take a step forward off last years level of performance) was a much better D 1 prospect than Barrino. Very surprised SPU was not successful targeting Barrino.
That's why I am not a talent evaluator....coming from a guy who thought Larry Bird was too slow to be the first pick in the NBA draft. :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by newfan on Dec 12, 2014 9:31:04 GMT -5
We will see about Harris I guess, when the time comes, only a verbal. Barrino, has this season to go, we'll see what he brings. Also AAU coach will, I'm sure have input where he goes. Wyche has had solid performances this season and some not bad but not his best. I like to think last year he had to learn on the job, some frosh point guards have the chance to play behind experienced guard and get to watch,learn, and play, which is great because ball is in points hand most of time. Some don't and have to figure it on the court. Feel he is doing a good job and will get better. Like I stated I like guard play, one thing it is hard to run an offense when there are players on the court who do not know the set, and therefore need direction while running the play, don't have time during game. Also now Desi back, think flow will be better. Note Trevis and Q, both young, unlike many of their MAAC counterparts, ie: Iona, Marist, etc where they are redshirt 20++ year old guys with the extra years under their belt. SPU looks better these past few games and I feel they will push forward. Sunday will be rough always 5 on 7 there. Just my thoughts
|
|
|
|
Post by spcfan on Dec 13, 2014 7:19:04 GMT -5
Barrino has offers from Iona and Fordham as well per verbal commits.We also offered Hakeem Rogers out of Elizabeth HS currently at Casper Wyoming JC. Rogers has a number of other offers including some from higher level schools like Kent state and Southern Miss.
|
|
|
|
Post by figgyprez on Dec 13, 2014 13:46:34 GMT -5
Given existence of Boone, Patterson, Hester, Dennis and first guard commit, SP is looking for a backup PG to replace Fields. That's a tough sell- sit behind Wyche for 2 years- don't think you're going to get Norm Van Lier with that sell. So a competent JC guard is about what I'd expect in that spot. Don't think staff is thinking a starter at any time with this spot on roster. I still like some NJ hs guards,some I think could help out a lot soon and start in 2 years, but they might not want to wait and here's a thought my evaluation of them might be wrong and coaches either don't like them as much or the kid isn't interested at this point. At any rate size is a priority as always.
|
|
|
|
Post by JohnGalt on Dec 13, 2014 16:03:22 GMT -5
...or a young, still developing hs guard that u redshirt the first year. Practice with the team and absorb alongside staff on the bench. Ideal apprenticeship for a point guard.
|
|
|
|
Post by loyal on Dec 14, 2014 20:02:09 GMT -5
A thought re: recruiting a "back up" PG.....
Has Wyche really played well enough this year to avoid being "recruited over"? I think not.
Do I hope he plays better and improves over last years performance? Of course. Has TW improved since last year? Not one iota.
It's early, but it may be time to at least start thinking about whether we should assume TW is the best we can do at PG for the next two seasons, based on his play so far this year.
Just a subjective thought.
Comments?
|
|
|
|
Post by junctionkid on Dec 15, 2014 17:22:50 GMT -5
It is such a pleasure to respond to one of the , thankfully , big majority of posters here who are rational and who make positive and negative posts about the players and staff in the spirit that we all enjoy the Peacock basketball program and want so much to see it succeed to the extent possible .
Your posts might be considered a negative one about a player whose game I love as a hoop fan . But you have every right to pose that question and open up a discussion that makes this board fun . We can all do that without the need for a board sheriff as long as the posts are not mean-spirited about those players or staff; just offered as opinions .
You may turn out to be very right in your opinion here ( that TW has not played well enough this season to avoid being recruited over and that he has not improved one iota since last year .). I may be right in disagreeing on both . The beauty of such honest disagreements is that it opens up the opportunity to discuss a program that we all root so hard for . That's great , and you made it that way by asking for comments at the end of your post . The other beauty about such discussions is that we will never establish who was right or wrong no matter how Trevis' career turns out for himself or the Peacocks . There are simply too many variables involved to ever know - the play of others on the team , the abilities of the staff to maximize Trevis' play via their strategy and tactics and so , so many other factors .
Nevertheless , the discussion is fun . My strong belief - again just an opinion as a fan - is that Trevis' play has improved significantly over last year and I think he had a very good season last year .
One area where I believe that is much , much better is getting the ball up the court against pressure . Perfect ? No . But , his performance here has been about as good as you can expect from a MAAC guard OR maybe any college guard . More precisely, in terms of this improvement , has been this player who came to as a strong guy is even stronger . Quite a few times this year , we have gotten the ball into Trevis in the deep corner surrounded closely by two other players . Is his getting the ball in such a disadvantageous position caused by the staff not doing their job properly , from another player not being in the right position because of his fault or some fault of Trevis himself ? All are possibilities . We can't ever know that . But what we do know , or at least what my eyes have told me from seeing every game but one and seeing three of those games at least five times with the benefit of repeating plays over and over again - is that once Trevis has gotten the ball in such a bad position he has gotten the ball up court either with the dribble getting between the two opponents or being freakin' amazingly strong in getting the ball over the two to another Peacock in a good position . The other area that has gotten so much better in this aspect of the game is when pressed by only one player is the use of a change of pace in the dribble or a momentary backward movement . These are two aspects of guard play that most guys don't do well and therefore are beautiful to watch as a fan who loves guard play and particularly point guard play .
The second part of the point guard play - in the half court - is much tougher to gauge and much more open to disagreement because the variables increase a whole lot . But my opinion is that Trevis' play is better than last season here also . I am not big one on judging players via stats and particularly point guard play . But I use them from time to time ( when they support my position ) and have no problem with people who use them in the sense that they are the only purely objective measure that we have . But I'd rather judge a point guard with my eye . By that measure , again to my eye , Trevis is stronger going to the hoop than last season . And that is just as important , and maybe more important , to the import of a point guard's ability to up a defense than his ability to shoot from the outside . If a point guard can get to the elbow with the real threat to get to the hoop for a basket or two fouls , it really opens the defense to wide open jumpers if the staff can properly design plays and utilize other players' skills . My guess is that this staff can indeed do that . The way we opened up the SHU game with the right plan to deter their obvious plan to press us was impressive . Rest of the game not so impressive .
I also think that Trevis has gotten better with his shot form . No so much , though a bit , with his three shot but quite a bit with his pull up jumper . Though the sample is admittedly very small , he has shown much improved form on two pull-up Js that he has made this season . Will he ever be a real threat here ? Just my guess but I think that he is tough enough and talented enough and dedicated enough to do just about anything he sets his mind to . So has Trevis improved his half court point play this season . My vote is that he clearly has . As much as I hoped ? No . But I'll take it without question
The length of this post has nothing to do with my disagreement with you on this matter . You have every right in the world to be on the other side . You may be the right one on it . As I said we'll never really know . But that doesn't matter at all . What matters for me is that I got opportunity to post at length about a player whose game I love to watch . And that was due to your post .
|
|
|
|
Post by figgyprez on Dec 15, 2014 19:37:01 GMT -5
Loyal I can think of lots of point guards who might have been over recruited after 2 years- remember that save old timer most on this board-myself included were ready to throw Leon away at that point and were shown to be wrong. They were ready to discard Gerald Greene at SHU after his soph year and he got them to a Final 4. Staff also doesn't want to get a rep for over recruiting, but I think you can get a frosh who can get minutes at 1 and 2 and let him step in eventually.
|
|
